Sunday, December 13, 2009

LED lighting: Rant update.

Since indicating and promoting our invivo unsuccessful attempts to obtain LED lighting to retrofit our aging compact fluorescent lamps a lot has changed in three months.
Time constraints just now make it important to keep this brief. Bottom line, WalMart now stocks a limited number of indoor, outdoor and Par LED lamps. Yep, they are pricey but not as expensive as those on-line. The compromise in price is at the cost of life span. A 1,000 lumen WalMart stocked brand has 40,000 hours of life as opposed to a 1,000 lumen one on-line for 15 bucks more having 60,000 hours of life.
 
  From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
  for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
  Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ Web Blog and the
  Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited 
  to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big

Friday, October 30, 2009

Update - LED lighting

The up front cost of LED replacement equivalent lamps can be somewhat daunting to the uninitiated.  
  One must and probably will do the math before their first replacement of conventional incandescent lamps and compact fluorescent models with LED lighting. Before dismissal out of hand one should be aware of three key technical factoids which MUST be factored into the buying formula (these are not the ONLY factors, but still these three items MUST be remembered and referenced to when buying replacement LED bulbs).
  1. Lumens not watts are the primary quality of lamp lighting. Lumens are the measured amount of light a lamp emits (in the visible-to-the-eye spectrum of light). One does not replace a 100 watt incandescent light with an equivalent LED light so much as one replaces a 100 watt, 920 Lumen incandescent lamp taking 10 hours to burn 1 kilowatt hour of energy with a 6.4 watt, 900 Lumen LED lamp taking 156 hours to burn 1 kilowatt hour of energy to see by, and so forth. The "color temperature" of the Lumens is also important with "Cool White" and "Warm White" the most common buzz terms to consider depending on where and for what need they are to be used...
  2. Watts are burned to make the light one needs for an application for both indoor and outdoor lighting. The reduced LED wattage has a double importance for indoor lighting in that during summer operation one's cooling system does not have to remove near as much waste heat (average .075th of the heat) from LED lights as compared to equivalent incandescent lighting. (Remember from your high school science, that Watts are a measure of heat energy, originally for steam engines and later for electrical generators.). Practically speaking, all lighting energy converts back into heat energy.
  Both indoor and outdoor LED lighting applications reduce the amount of non-renewable, greenhouse emissions of one's electrical utility as well; and that will take pressure off of installation of ever more transmission lines to carry ever greater demand for that irreplaceable-never-going-away-electrical-product. In many applications it is actually cost effective to install solar panels on security night light standard poles populated by low battery power consumpting LED's that would otherwise have to have transmission lines run to them in new public locations. Large back yards could benefit from solar powered LED motion activated security lighting; breaking even when one does not have to run building code safe wiring to a new security light system. The criminal sport of stripping copper wiring from municipal light standard poles would be circumvented, as well.
  3. LED lighting averages 50,000 hours MLBF "Mean Life Before Failure" which is significantly less than the 8,000 MLBF to replace compact fluorescent lamps (requiring special handling to dispose of these mercury rich appliances) and 1,200 MLBF for the average incandescent lamp. Most municipalities and large business operations have full time paid staff that do nothing but replace lighting during their 8-5 week long shifts with overtime if they get behind. Factor these considerations in when contemplating the "high cost" of replacement of home or business or municipal lighting with ultra-long-life LED lighting, as well.
  It has been four plus years and a substantial reduction in our utility bill later since retrofitting to compact fluorescent lighting. We think it is time to step up and replace CFL's and incandescent lighting as they burn out with LED's for even more savings. The average return on investment is less than three years with the next 12 to 15 years MLBF that follow being all gravey. jwr
.
Other LED Links
End.

HANDY SWITCH RECALL PRODUCT RECALL NOTICE

For those of y'all that use the wireless Handy Switch or know of
someone who may have one or more of them; this is a recall
you can take advantage of because it is a manufacturer based
recall... I bought my first Handy Switch through Idea Village
a number of years ago and have a night lamp plugged into it
that we use when getting up during the wee hours which can
be turned on while we pad around in our otherwise dark house,
then turned back off once we stumble into bed-die bye,
afterwords. Later I found it on sale at Fry's Electronics and got
one for our kitchen cabinet under shelf add-on fluorescent
lighting instead of fumbling for thumb switches, toggle wheels 
and buttons to push; all left in the ON position and powered
through one wireless switch located at the most used work
station of our kitchen counter. All the extension wiring is neatly
tie-wrapped.
.
When I called the recall toll free number and talked to a nice
Asian accented lady. I found that my admission that I only
bought ONE Handy Switch from Idea Village she smoothly
said that they would send TWO prepaid mailers for BOTH
Handy Switches... This was a Manufacturer's recall. Read the
recall email message below to get the link or toll free number
for your own cycle of action. Don't ignore it, please. jwr
.
P.S., As a retired tradesman I can explain that the switch, while
low to nil power consuming while in the Off mode, DOES have
a potential to overheat due to a phenomenon known as and
related to how it works while idle. "Hysteresis Loss" is the
phenomenon; when in an idle mode. That is the phenomenon
that power coils and transformers have in which a trickle of
electricity leaks through a circuit and is designed into them
such that the leakage creates a counter-effect which impedes
or chokes off any more energy from leaking through the coil
or transformer. Very fine wire devices may break or short out
over the age of a device - when that happens they allow more
energy to "Leak Through" it. Eventually they burn out more and
more fine wires and eventually burn out in a burst of short
circuited energy when too much heat builds up in themselves
to choke off the power. Modern devices use electronic circuits
to choke the idle-but-not-off use of energy, now. They don't
waste Hysteresis Energy at all. End. See In-line attached below.

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Handy Switch Customer Service <handyswitch.cs@fulfillment.com>
To: JOSEPH W RICHARDSON <GREEN.METROPLEX@YAHOO.COM>
Sent: Wed, October 21, 2009 4:33:26 PM
Subject: HANDY SWITCH RECALL PRODUCT RECALL NOTICE

RE:    IMPORTANT RECALL NOTICE

October 21, 2009

Dear Valued Customer,

Our records indicate that you purchased a Handy Switch Wireless Remote Light Switch from IdeaVillage. We strive to ensure that each product we deliver is the best quality and provides the best possible customer experience.

It has come to our attention that the receiver (the component that fits into the wall outlet with a built-in night light) can overheat, posing a fire hazard to consumers. The company has received 14 reports of overheating, including 9 reports of fire, 5 of which resulted in property damage. No injuries have been reported.. You should unplug and stop using your receiver and register for a free remedy.

In cooperation with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, IdeaVillage is voluntarily providing consumers with the choice of one of two free remedies: (1) a snap-on protective cap cover to place over the receiver to securely contain any possible fire due to overheating or (2) a wireless remote light switch replacement product.

If you prefer a snap-on protective cap cover, we will send you a protective cap to simply place over the receiver, along with easy installation instructions. Note this cover will not prevent overheating from occurring, but rather will contain any resulting fire. If you prefer a wireless remote light switch replacement product, we will send you a postage pre-paid mailer in which to place your Handy Switch receiver (the component that plugs into the wall) to send it back to us. Upon receipt of your receiver, we will send a replacement product, the Super Switch, free of charge.

For more information on the recall program and registration for your free remedy, please visit our website at: www.handyswitchrecall.com or call IdeaVillage toll-free at: (888) 655-4339 between 5:00 am and 6:00 pm (Pacific) Monday through Friday. You can also contact customer service by email at handyswitch.cs@fulfillment.com.

We appreciate your patience.

Sincerely,

David Epstein
Vice President

Zero E House in Lewisville Texas

Dateline Friday, 30 October 2009
 
Hey there Guy,

 

Here's a first hat-pass as we search for a less censorious domain

and email provider than Yahoo! for the green-metroplex caucus
to be parked on.

.

The Dallas Morning News Metro section covered by writer

Wendy Hundley whundley@dallasnews.com of this eco-friendly

home, soon to be lived in by Amanda Ferguson's and her
Husband Scott
Owens after tearing down the old family frame

house that she grew up in. The project has become a poster

child for Green Craft Builders, LLC et all, who specialize in the
construction
of Zero-E homes and offices in the DFW Metroplex.  

.
If you link to nothing else on their domain website, go to the
video links and turn up the volume on your speakers when you
peruse their assorted construction of assorted eco-friendly items.
That page alone is worth the half hour or so it'll take to view
the videos of the construction and knowledge base available
concerning the Timber Creek Energy Zero House built right here
in the DFW Metroplex: http://timbercreekzeroenergyhouse.com/videos.html
Keep a notepad handy for the first rate links to sustainable construction
products and other useful earth friendly goods. I personally book
marked them and also highlighted, copied and pasted their URL's
into an info manager,
just to be sure the links were not typo'd.
There is a tour of the house during the next four Fri - Sat's.
.
Here is the home page link, also: http://timbercreekzeroenergyhouse.com/
  From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
  for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
  Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ Web Blog and the
  Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited 
  to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big

Sunday, September 27, 2009

We ain't running out of no stinking oil!

   Ahem: In the news are exasperated pro-oil types that rant about there being no lack of oil available; stating that the available "reserves" and still undiscovered oil available which are sufficient to satisfy the greediest good oil boys n girls for centuries.
   In truth, it is a more or less correct factoid that we are NOT running out of oil at this time. What's being overlooked is that the barrels per year increase of oil pumped out of the ground is in still in decline since a decade ago; however stocks of oil are approaching glut proportions but that is laid squarely at the feet of we who are cutting  back on our consumption of its distilled products such as diesel fuel and gasoline. 
   A goodly number of Americans have rerouted their consumption to thriftier auto's and reduced discretionary spending on fuel and by staying home a lot more (thus making home entertainment a banner year last year) or moving closer to their workplace to reduce their commute and impacting the urbane sprawl and new home building market to some degree. Indeed the local paper has touted the resurgence of formerly blighted inner city areas by the jump in loft apartments and converted warehouse into condominiums populated by Gen Y'ers and Millenials, making it possible for thousands of former commuters to peddle to work or ride the street car or bus to there.
   What's being overlooked is that it is no longer possible for one to kick over a clod and bring in a gusher of the black gold that used make $235 bucks per wildcat dollar in profit as it travels through various streams into "higher" grade byproducts. The recent discovery of an astounding sized "oil reserve" in the Gulf of Mexico is a classic example of the the availability of oil "still out there waiting to be found." Umm, has anyone figured out how much it's going to cost to build a floating platform able to safely maintain its position over the oil reserves in deepwater, open seaways in the face of hurricanes; drill to 35,000 feet to tap into the top of the dome of this shale oil; to extract it via fracturing and pump it to the surface and load it onto ships bound for refinery's?
   And secondarily, this oil which will be in production in about ten years, is still only a fraction of the 3% total US Market oil produced in and used by Americans. The reason that we import 97% of our oil is that the imported oil is still cheaper and easier to get to the surface and into tankers bound for US refineries folks, precisely because oil has to be ever higher in price for it to be profitable to drill and pump it. That price, based on world wide demand is currently somewhere in the $65 buck a barrel range it would seem. (A decade ago crude was around $35.00 USD per barrel. Remember, it was the spiraling price of crude that triggered the U.S. economic melt down powered by $145.00 per barrel prices that we are still recovering from and it is only Americans <with the rest of the world following our lead> with the sense to cut back on our discretionary consumption of energy which has dropped the price of fuel and stabilized the economy, so far; That is in spite of the economic bail out headlines taking the credit. Shoot, even my insurance broker has a Smart Car for his commute to his offices, now.).
   Meanwhile China and India and a number of other sleeping giant middle class auto buyers world wide continue to grow at rates that outstrip US ability to compete for market share, while our dollars get less and less valuable due to the enormous debt being deeded over to those several other countries. And never forget, oil IS the gold standard of the world because it is the tremendous markup from crude to products that drives it as a major commodity that is getting more and more costly to extract from mother Earth and on its way to market.
   Meanwhile, once again, the good oil boys have tried to flourish the red cape in front of our consuming eyes to distract us from the fact that we need to be firm in our resolve to make carbon fuels of all types only a dwindling part of a triad of energy. We really need to convert to none-carbon, renewable fuels as fast as we can manage it; with electric battery power as fuel as a major change away from Detroit pig-iron cars and trucks belching fumes rich with greenhouse gases.
   Whew
  From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
  for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
  Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ Web Blog and the
  Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited 
  to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big

Friday, September 25, 2009

The next step down in lighting power consumption

At the risk of appearing to brag, our electrical consumption stats (measured in Kilowatt Hours) are down by over 35% since four plus years ago when we first decided to "Go Green;" that is because we have implemented most of those things posted on the www.green-metroplex.com website and our blogs. Our deciduous shade is keeping the sun off in the summer; almost all of our appliances are Energy Star rated; we unplug most electrical vampires when not in use; and all but a couple lights are fluorescent or compact fluorescent, as well. We're our own guinea pig when it comes to making these suggestions for how to save money by becoming greener over time (out of cash flow). Now, many of our compact fluorescent lighting bulbs are starting to approach their life span and we admit to lusting after LED lighting to replace them as the CFL's wear out. Our CFL's have paid us back in spades in their kilowatt power saving so we are looking to reduce our power needs even more by using the new LED lighting technology during our next replacement go-round and reduce our carbon footprint even more by not having to recycle mercury rich CFL's any longer, either
However...
While trying to shop them at our local Lowe's Home Improvement - I found that they stock not one LED lamp, period. At Wal-Mart there are stick on under-shelf LED's and we actually have a small number of those at home in the odd dark nook, because they are so handy to use. The spouse is not happy with the intense color of LED stick on lights and flashlights we own, but I've witnessed how demonstration full sized LED lighting replacements have tinted lenses to compensate for this nuisance factor.
At any rate, what I'm looking for is a tenfold drop in lighting power for the same lumen's count as our former incandescents used to emit and our compact florescent lamps which have fairly well matched their outputs for the past half decade. Remember, it's lumen's not watts that are the target prime benchmark, i.e., just sufficient brightness that one does not have to peer intently to easily see and not too bright such that one needs sunglasses to not squint whilst in their presence.
So far I've been stumped at finding retrofit LED Lamps in retail venues the local area - however, here's a link to my first cast into the Internet: http://www.earthled.com/ ... I'll keep you posted. wr
 
From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ and the
Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited
to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Model Electrical Triad: Updated

        A suggested...
model standard
(For an Electrical Generation Triad)


 

Adoption of this model electrical regulation concept by ERCOT and utility regulators in other states would accelerate a trend toward renewable energy solutions and a reduction of pollution and greenhouse gas emissions that are fostered by the burning of none renewable fuels for electrical production. This triad would not do away with conventional power generators, nor nuclear power plants, because to do so is not practical nor will it win support from major stockholders of utility companies, many of whom contribute significant cash for re-elections of those representatives that ERCOT and other utility regulators in other states are answerable to.

Utility companies faced with mandates from their regulators will find it in their stockholders best interests to jump on the band-wagon and start installation of PV and none wind turbulence damaged wind turbines on the buildings in cities and suburbs to which they supply electrical energy; instead of buying ever larger blocks of carbon credits, with this suggested scheme. They would make de-facto partners of their electrical consuming customers by the utilization of inside city limits subscribers' structures, by implementation of lease-back, low fixed kilowatt hourly rates as a means to pay down the installation price of these systems on their customers' buildings and otherwise unused inner-city land. It is a win-win scenario.

The utilities' existing grid-connected conventional electrical power plants would be retained and used as load-leveling sites for the existing grid, which should require no new high tension power lines to be installed as load demands continue to increase every year; because the commercial sized solar (focused solar for steam and PV systems) and wind turbines that they themselves would, for the most part, be installed at the load end of their grid since these generators do not pollute nor make greenhouse gases when making electrical energy.


Above is an example of a wind turbine that is not damaged by wind turbulence.
There are twisted, multi-vane horizontal-axle variants as well. These turbines are low
speed, quiet and none-lethal-to-nature. When mounted with inexpensive, self-powered
so-called  "anti-gravity" thrust bearings (essentially comprised of like-charged direct-
current magnetic fields that repel each the other, effectively making them frictionless
bearings) this type of turbine does not induce the structural damage or noise caused
by the induced vibration of conventional bearings, to the tops of buildings that they are
mounted upon.

Source: http://www.green-metroplex.com/Assorted/Ideas/Electrical_Triad.html posted on Tuesday, 9/22/2009
 


The conundrum of utility regulators toward environmentally progressive reform

Dear Texas State and Federal Legislator, et al,

 

I have an idea for ERCOT that addresses the conundrum of emotionally conservative vested interests that block progress toward an more environmentally friendly utility regulation body. Please consider it and pass it on to them if you concur:

 

    

        A suggested...
model standard
(For an Electrical Generation Triad)


 

Adoption of this model electrical regulation concept by ERCOT and utility regulators in other states would accelerate a trend toward renewable energy solutions and a reduction of pollution and greenhouse gas emissions that are fostered by the burning of none renewable fuels for electrical production. This triad would not do away with conventional power generators, nor nuclear power plants, because to do so is not practical nor will it win support from major stockholders of utility companies, many of whom contribute significant cash for re-elections of those representatives that ERCOT and other utility regulators in other states are answerable to.

Utility companies faced with mandates from their regulators will find it in their stockholders best interests to jump on the band-wagon and start installation of PV and none wind turbulence damaged wind turbines on the buildings in cities and suburbs to which they supply electrical energy; instead of buying ever larger blocks of carbon credits, with this suggested scheme. They would make de-facto partners of their electrical consuming customers by the utilization of inside city limits subscribers' structures, by implementation of lease-back, low fixed kilowatt hourly rates as a means to pay down the installation price of these systems on their customers' buildings and otherwise unused inner-city land. It is a win-win scenario.

The utilities' existing grid-connected conventional electrical power plants would be retained and used as load-leveling sites for the existing grid, which should require no new high tension power lines to be installed as load demands continue to increase every year; because the commercial sized solar (focused solar for steam and PV systems) and wind turbines that they themselves would, for the most part, be installed at the load end of their grid since these generators do not pollute nor make greenhouse gases when making electrical energy.


Above is an example of a wind turbine that is not damaged by wind turbulence.
There are twisted, multi-vane horizontal-axle variants as well. These turbines are low
speed, quite and none-lethal-to-nature. When mounted with inexpensive, self-powered
so-called  "
anti-gravity" thrust bearings
this type of turbine does not induce structural
damage caused by induced vibration, to the tops of buildings that they are mounted upon. 

 
 
From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ and the
Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited
to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big

Sunday, September 13, 2009

Hydrates - an unraveling disaster in the wings

This Reply came from a "Hardball_Player" list member who also reads the Information Not Spam Blog: "Dear Mr. Warren, OK I understood most of your news article a.k.a., your opinion, about the Northwest Passage shipping which is opening up next summer due to global warming. But you lost me with your inserted comments about hydrates. What the heck does that have to do with the cost of lumber from Russia? What are hydrates and why should I care?"
My reply: Dear Reader, Excellent questions. (be advised if you want to see my reference materials, (some) of their links are at the bottom of this rant.) As you may have surmised, I am in the camp that foresees global warming as fact, not fiction, which is somewhat exacerbated by human activity in the form of none renewable fuel burning, also as a reality. In my opinion, based on years of study of the problem, there are three major air pollution sources and greenhouse gases. Sulfur Dioxide, Methane and Carbon Dioxide; all three are being pumped into the air every day from automobiles, electric plants, homes, businesses and cattle yards and every walk of life where burning of some form of fuel is converted to useful human uses most notably we make carbon dioxide and methane by the metric tons per hour into the air and into rivers and oceans, directly trapping quite a lot of the sun's solar energy in the air by these major greenhouse gases; directly warming our world's oceans (5 degrees on average over the past century of time), via absorption of the air's heat; which circulates from mid-earth latitudes into the polar regions causing ice sheet melt off.
Unfortunately, or fortunately depending on ones point of view, nature has natural sources (and counter balance forces) for these gases as well. However, human contributions are unbalancing those natural cycles. Our insertion of an un-natural addition of these greenhouse gases is on the verge of causing a major change in the rate of capture of nature's stored up methane and carbon dioxide and there are those in the scientific community who say that we very possibly may have passed the point of no return. What they are alluding to is the carbon dioxide stored in the form of a mix of carbon dioxide and methane hydrates on the ocean floor.
To understand these carbon chemical compounds requires a bit of understanding of how carbon dioxide and methane reacts to pressure and temperature. Carbon Dioxide and Methane is found free floating in the air and also dissolved in water, much like one finds oxygen and nitrogen there as well. You already know that oxygen dissolved in water is what makes it possible for fish to breath underwater. Their gills filter the water flowing through them and extract the oxygen their muscles and digestive tracts need, to make the energy needed for survival. Like animals on the surface, the product of breathing by fishes creates a carbon dioxide bye product; having eaten plant or other food matter, their feces as well as the natural death of plants makes methane gas directly or through decomposition; as their feces decays it causes methane formation, as well. Air breathing and fuel burning, likewise cause carbon dioxide on the surface but what affects global climate the most severely is the 25 fold pollution effects of methane more than carbon dioxide; decomposition of plant and fecal mater also makes the vast majority of methane in nature. The build up of temperature causes fresh and salt water to absorb the methane and carbon dioxide, as well. The gist of what I'm explaining is so that you'll understand that there is a lot of greenhouse affect carbon in the form of these two chemicals dissolved and in solution in water and in the vast water columns called oceans of earth in particular. In a nutshell, the warmer the water, the less greenhouse gas will stay in the water.
In chemistry, simply put, there are three major physical conditions for elements and compounds and they are: Gas, Liquid and Solid. (Yes SW, plasma is the 4th but not needed in this dissertation on condensed star stuff called carbons in the form of methane and carbon dioxide.). Gas, liquids and solids depend on both temperature and pressure to determine which state one will find them in. At sea level pressures and temperatures one finds them as a gas. In water columns with pressures less than 450 feet one finds them dissolved and in liquid states. However, as the temperature approaches 33 degrees and pressures build at depths past 480 feet we see that there are forces in play that make methane in particular and carbon dioxide to some degree; convert to solid states. Below 600 feet Methane at any temperature below 40 degrees is a solid as one continues down the continental slopes of the deep ocean and ever greater pressures. The condensed methane crystals have the appearance and form of the dirty water-ice one may be more familiar with; but would explode directly into gas if suddenly brought to above sea level pressures at the surface, much like dry ice does if not insulated. Carbon Dioxide is excreted in adapted ways by sea life but is much slower to convert to solids at deep ocean depths. In fact all of your high school chemistry courses and experiments are out the door when one is operating at low temperatures and high deep-sea pressures. For example it is the very high pressure of the ocean at thousands of feet down that makes it possible for sea water to NOT freeze at temperatures well below 32 degrees Fahrenheit in the pitch  black of abyssal deeps.
Here is the Point: As human introduction of un-natural quantities of methane via such activities as the cattle industry and carbon dioxide via electric production and via carbon dioxide emissions by automobiles continuously contribute to a spike in global air temperatures, which have warmed the the surface of the oceans of the world for the past 100 years, far more than it would naturally occur in nature - we are starting to warm hydrates which have been stable for many Millenia prior to this hundred year span of time.
By way of illustration: If one were to focus on one hydrate crystal structure, say the size of a full duffel bag, at 480 feet down on the ocean floor, say 50 years ago - the one degree rise in temperature at that time would have caused it to emit (for illustration purposes) one bubble of methane gas every month or two. At 500 feet, say, one bubble per year; and no bubbles at all below say, 600 feet. Today most of the hydrates will have disappeared through evaporation at 450 feet, due to the steady rise in ocean temperature. Hydrates at 500 feet are bubbling daily and at 600 feet you'd find bubbles forming and taking off toward the surface at irregular intervals and at 700 feet they could be found forming slowly on the outside surface of hydrates, if one looked closely.
To get a sense of scale, if you were to lay a postage stamp on the ground then try to imagine that you could encompass the area the size of the United States in comparison; that is the jump in scale that occurred in methane gas release by humans from 100 years ago through now, in present time. One tends to forget just how immense the size of our ocean floors are and the tremendous greenhouse gas reserves stored under a very sensitive temperature/pressure ratio experiment in physics, in its vast and deep waters. Their combined area makes the United States look like the postage stamp in this comparison, by comparison.
Our only recourse is a crash course change in life-style in which we change very fast to a none carbon burning/consuming populace wherein whatever form of renewable none carbon based energy we use is both renewable and storable for periods when it's not easily available (i.E., focused array solar-heated, pressurized sodium storage for electric generation both during the day and at night.)... It's a given that we'll have to use current industry to make solar collectors and turbulence tolerant inner city wind turbines of every hue and sort; unearthing our waste dumps, composting everything and planting vast forests on that to lock up the carbon dioxide into trees to increase oxygen ratios and reduce CO2; during the interim we'll continue burning diesel fuel to power drills to tap into Geo-thermal and other renewable resources, etc., add infinausia. The question is will we, our elected representatives who reflect our collective will and the other Doubting Thomas types get on board a fast, furious phase over before the tipping point is beyond our ability to come back from the precipice? Or, more brutally, before we become extinct as a species because we cannot adapt to the reality the earth is foisting onto us in payment for our ignorance as to what we are doing to it because we didn't understand the World Wide Physics involved while keeping Pandora's Box open, like it or not?
 
References:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Information-NotSpam/message/391 <-- Source of term "Hyddrates" that started this thread. end
 
From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ and the
Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited
to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big!
                           Click here to look at an excellent model solid waste recycling program! 
                                                                                                   

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Hymotion Prius Hybrid plug-in upgrade in the news.

On the environmentally good news front there is a "new" player in the Prius Hybrid game that specializes in converting these already high mileage cars to 100 MPG + Plug-in capability. The conversion entails retrofitting a stock Prius Hybrid with heavier gas cushion load-leveling shocks and heavier springs; a much larger battery system and a plug-in charging harness along with rewiring to incorporate the system into Prius' computer monitors and controllers.. The conversion takes about 6 hours by an authorized conversion garage. Mileage jumps to 100 mpg rating (but only for 30-40 miles before the extra batteries then revert to the standard ICE* charge/surge of a stock Prius.). At any rate, for average drivers this means their daily errands and commute will be all on battery power. The heavier battery pack's weight penalty is about the same as packing a large adult around at all times which is offset by the increased distance the batteries can go on a full charge plus some. With the steady incline of gasoline prices which are predicted to exceed the 2008 price spike but without the collapse that followed, this system makes sense.
* ICE, Internal Combustion Engine

Friday, August 21, 2009

Fw: [CR4] New comment to 'Wind Turbines Without Teeth' by Guest

Here is some really terrific environmental tech news! It is about Direct Drive wind turbines, which will surely drive their cost down; their reliability up; and increase the fortunes of inverter manufactures a bunch. Now, WHERE are my Siemens and GE stock positions links? ;-)
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: "CR4, The Engineer's Place" <cr4admin@globalspec.com>
To: Tinker65 <jwarrenr@rocketmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:00:00 AM
Subject: [CR4] New comment to 'Wind Turbines Without Teeth' by Guest
Hello CR4 user Tinker65,
There was a new comment by Guest (replying to chrisg288) in a discussion that you subscribed to:
Wind Turbines Without Teeth (http://cr4.globalspec.com/blogentry/275?frmtrk=cr4sd#newcomments)
You can see all of your subscribed discussions on this page: http://cr4.globalspec.com/user/subscribeddiscussions?u=14764&frmtrk=cr4sd
NOTE: You will only receive this one alert for any subscription events until you visit CR4 again (or a week goes by).
You can change this setting by editing your <user name deleted> profile.
Thanks,
The CR4 Crew
http://cr4.globalspec.com

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

One progressive city has a retrofit solar panel program for everyman.

SOURCE: Urban Eco Electric

Urban Eco Electric, solar electric company  
Aug 19, 2009 11:00 ET

Urban Eco Electric, New Philadelphia Electric Company, Hosts "Beer for Bills" Events

Trade in Your Peco "Clunkers" for a Beer and Free Solar Panels

PHILADELPHIA, PA--(Marketwire - August 19, 2009) - On August 20 and August 27, 2009, homeowners are invited to learn how they can get free solar panels and lower their electric bills during "Beer for Bills" events Urban Eco Electric (UEE) is sponsoring. Urban Eco plans to install 5,000 solar PV systems on Philadelphia homes with no upfront cost to the homeowner. These events are a chance to learn how they can participate in helping the environment while saving on their electric bills.

August 20                     August 27 Belgian Café                  Manayunk Brewery 2047 Green Street             4120 Main Street Philadelphia, PA              Philadelphia, PA (215) 235-3500                (215) 482-8220 

Urban Eco, a new kind of power company, is making solar energy affordable and practical for Philadelphians. Now urban residents can participate in going green without the prohibitive upfront costs. Through UEE's first-of-its-kind lease program, homeowners can lower their carbon footprint while reaping sizeable savings on their ongoing electric bill.

A brief overview of Urban Eco's solar equipment lease program:

-- Homeowners enter into a lease agreement for 20 years with Urban Eco Electric who then assumes all the upfront costs as well as ongoing maintenance.

-- Urban Eco then reduces the homeowner's (average) electric bill by 50% for the first two years of the lease.

-- Further savings are realized in years three and beyond when Urban Eco freezes their electric bill for the remainder of the lease. Pennsylvania will see significant rate hikes when the legal rate caps are removed in 2011.

-- Overall realized savings are roughly $20,000 to $30,000 for the panels; $15,000 for electricity savings.

David Blumenfeld, Philadelphia real estate attorney and founder of Urban Eco Electric, says, "Without this program, solar power would be virtually unattainable for many homeowners. I'm glad we can provide a way for our neighborhoods to benefit while creating a brighter, cleaner future for us all."

For more information, please visit www.go-uee.com. Homeowners are invited to call (215) 909-6814 for more information or a free in-home consultation. Contact information: Petrina Fisher Wells, Wells Marketing Group, www.wellsmarketinggroup.com.

Contact:
Email Contact
Wells Marketing Group
215-391-3300
From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ and the
Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ .... You are invited
to come see how cost effective, and even profitable, it can be 
to
                                                   go green!
                                                Click here to look at an excellent model solid waste recycling program! 

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

EXXON to invest $600 million into a moonshine outfit

 From the Desktop of 

J. Warren Richardson

 

Perhaps things are not at a status quo with EXXON. Wonders never cease. Big-time oil gorilla, EXXON Corporations' good oil boys ("Oil" is spoken ole, in Texan) have authorized the investment of $600,000,000 bucks into a partnership with biotech firm Synthetic Genomics. This appears to be a top management reversal of position from the same folks that called the biofuel startups in Texas, "The Moonshine Industry."
Perhaps I'm being unfair, in my hair splitting, in that most biofuel is alcohol from corn and Genomics specializes in algae and pond scum that they have genetically enhanced and use to force produce biofuel byproducts from banks upon banks of digester tanks in industrial warehouses. This appears to be a serious, profit motivated effort to supply the growing demand for alcohol as additives in gas and biodiesel fuel, as well. Both endeavors support both camps of thought about liquid fuels. I.E., The camp which agrees that there is a global warming issue to address and the camp who see vehicle fuel as a strategic issue – secondarily to the question of capitalism's preference for profits and primarily as the need of energy for war fighting capability should the oil tankers stop coming to America. (Best-guessed to start around 2014).
Perhaps EXXON may even recognize that the U.S. Military, quietly but with intense determination, is building up ever growing numbers of vehicles of all types, including aircraft, to run on domestic bio-energy in case of a world disruption of these critical energy sources and EXXON is doing its part to make sure it has a piece of the pie. Perhaps what has tipped the balance for EXXON is its desire to remain a capitalist corporation which is under pressure from the fed to wake up and feel the heat of growing awareness that vehicle fuel is beginning to look like a strategic energy and the fed will definitely nationalize energy if the good ole boys don't wake the hell up and get on the bandwagon!
Perhaps many of the machinations by OPEC and ONGEC* who are muscle flexing in anticipation of testing out something big, are beginning to penetrate into the awareness of corporate level oil tycoons.  OPEC and ONGEC member countries, dominated by oppressive political leaders with no love of America would use oil and natural gas to break the strangle hold America's got on the world in a second but for our strategic presence in the middle east. They will do so at some point, if these country's continue along the trends they have already established. At which point our country will nationalize our own oil and alternative energy production in the name of strategic national survival because these industries have failed to see the handwriting on the wall and made moves, yesterday, right now, to be ready for the coming Tsunami of change. 
Perhaps it isn't such a leap to consider the oil and other energy businesses being Nationalized, in view of that being the case of the auto industry, the banking and insurance and mortgage underwriting industries…
Perhaps.
-
*Organization of Natural Gas Exporting Countries

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Vetoe'd TV Recycling Bill - 5 short snippets from a local environmental blog

Here'er some snippets from a recent blog I've started participating in regarding North Texas environmental issues at this URL: http://energyandenvironmentblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/06/rick-perry-rejects-tv-recyclin.html

The only good thing to come out of this was learning about the group Texas Campaign for the Environment. They stopped by my door and I was impressed with the person and the activities. They obviously watch their pennies closely and seem to have some really smart people.

On their website they show a pretty amazing success rate on the projects they take on...this veto must have been quite a blow.



I'm an educated person, (not that you need to be to know the importance of ANY recycling opportunities) but a stupid decision like Perry's angers me with such a passion that I cannot provide a tactful response.



According to Texas Campaign for the Environment, Governor Perry's veto message stated "Texas has repeatedly proven that wise incentives can accomplish environmental progress with far greater success than burdensome mandates, fees, regulations and extensive reporting requirements." It would have been nice if he mentioned even one example. Governor?



I too was shocked to hear Perry vetoed a bill that passed overwhelmingly in the house and the senate. In this case, environmentalists, manufacturers, and law-makers agreed that the producer takeback model is the long-term solution. The problems associated with toxic waste -- the overabundance and the disposal -- can only be seriously addressed when manufacturers become responsible and encouraged to design them for true recycling. That is why other states are passing similar laws and manufacturers themselves are hoping for a national law. Perry seems to be ignoring the best and long-term interests of his state and, again, siding instead with the few elite, for his own interest.



Nahhh, "Everyone Knows," that we don't have a problem with the lead, mercury and other poisonous toxins in TV's and other electronic divices
http://www.evertiq.com/news/13507
They are collected in solid waste dumps, well most of them are collected, anyway, and sent over seas for reprocessing by li'l kids with hammers and side cutters; who die by age 25 from mysterious illnesses.
Right?
Anyway - WE don't have to be responsible, let someone else worry about such things, such as land fill managers... Doesn't the Governor have enough to worry about on his plate without taking on the resonsibility that WE don't want for end products of our own blinde consumption. Sheesh - get a grip y'all.



Thank you to the contributors that mentioned Texas Campaign for the Environment in this thread. I'm impressed after doing a little due diligence on that group. Here are a couple URL's:
-
http://www.texasenvironment.org/
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Campaign_for_the_Environment 

 
From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ and the
Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited
to come see how cost effective, and even profitable, it can be 
to
                                                   go green!
                                                Click here to look at an excellent model solid waste recycling program! 

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Now that China has passed the US in auto sales

US auto buyers and drivers of automobiles are in for a slow-coming but definite shock over the next few months and years. Now that China has passed the US in auto sales (1.14 million vehicles sold in that country, for the month June of 2009) we are all of us going to see a steady increase in the price of gasoline that will not drop back after passing $4 bucks, like it did last summer. While OPEC members appear to all cheat on their barrel caps agreement among each other - the emerging gas consumption markets both in China and India are without doubt going to drive up competition for the oil that becomes gasoline, primarily in China and to a marked degree in India as well..
-
Naysayers point out that the China and India auto buyer demands very thrifty auto's. As such they won't significantly drive up the price of oil/gasoline. Problem is while three thrifty cars over there can go as far as one in the states can do - as their middle class continues to grow and ten times more of their citizens buy these thrifty cars the declining oil reserves they will deplete will cause an ever spiraling price war with the U.S. for our share of this resource, just from the sheer masses owning and driving them. (Basic supply and demand economics.).
-
In spite of Chevron hoarding the patent and manufacturing rights for the most efficient battery system on the planet, it is my opinion that conversion of conventional Internal Combustion Engine powered cars to hybrids is the way we should go for the interim as our God awful, mesmerized by horsepower auto industry flounders around and figures out what it is going to be when it grows up or completely dies away. In the meantime, I have been chaffing at the bit for two years now to get one formerly hopeful upstart to quit piddling around and put a full sized hybrid conversion system on my venerable and excellent Ford FreeStar. After all this time I've lost patience and am now researching in-wheel motor conversions for existing cars and trucks, instead. Below are the fruits of my tardy and brief current look at what's available. These are all from Youtube, enjoy. And, oh yes? One of these electric hod rods that can go 900 miles can do 0-60 in 4 seconds flat, for those motor-heads that want QUICK above all else: winking
-
Siemens is now in the Internal Combustion Engine auto conversion to Hybrid game. The Bailout video down lower on this list is by a Siemens executive and refers to this first video link on this list.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPSoNfmuBXc
900 mile hybrid electric Mini
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0Sy7XnJBPE&NR=1
Upbeat Mini Cooper 100 percent conversion to Electric Vehicle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjR1Z_uiVWo&NR=1
-
CAR MANUFACTURERS BAILOUT ISSUE OF NATIONAL SECURITY <-- A pretty good rant
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEQaa_xLl6c
Congressman Ron Paul on Bailing Out the Auto Industry
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kelMWnC4pRc&NR=1
-
From the desktop of Warren Richardson pro-active advocate
for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ and the
Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited
to come see how cost effective, and even profitable, it can be 
to
                                                   go green!
                                                Click here to look at an excellent model solid waste recycling program! 

Plug In America Tracks New Vehicle Progress

Plug In America Tracks New Vehicle Progress

-

"Wow!" That's what U.S.A. Today's Open Road blogger Chris Woodyard has to say about Plug In America's new Plug-In Vehicle Tracker, which has also gotten raves from supporters and auto companies alike.

-

It's a "fantastic tool," said David Bentley Busch, VP of Design for Bright Automotive.

You'll find the tracker, likely the world's most comprehensive list of its kind, through a link on our homepage - www.pluginamerica.org. It includes highway-capable cars and trucks, 2- and 3-wheeled vehicles and commercial vehicles available today or in development. All of its data, to be updated monthly, is sourced from auto companies or media. http://www.pluginamerica.org/plug-in-vehicle-tracker.html

-

The tracker also features each vehicle's targeted delivery date, and you can bet we'll be using that info to keep the auto companies honest.

-

The list generally does not include converted vehicles unless they have been emissions and crash tested. This is because Plug In America advocates for safe, clean-running vehicles that have been crash tested and certified as meeting national emissions standards, or better. The list also does not include Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEVs) because, while they reduce miles traveled on petroleum, many consumers want a plug-in that can replace their existing vehicle, namely, a highway-capable car. Moreover, many types of NEVs are already available today.

-

Plug In America owes a debt of gratitude and many thanks to one of our most dedicated volunteers, Ted Flittner, for creating our tracker. Thank you, Ted!

-

If you have any updates to the tracker, please email info@pluginamerica.org.

-

This news byte brought to you by Warren Richardson, A Metroplex Green Advocate ( http://www.green-metroplex.com )


Thursday, July 2, 2009

RE: $317 Million for Smart Electric Meters? I don't think so.

Mr. Richardson,

 

Thanks very much for the email. I can understand your frustration with the new meters, the new fees, etc. I can also appreciate your enthusiasm for alternative power generation technology.

However, I feel compelled to point out that Oncor is 80% owned by Energy Future Holdings, the former TXU Corp. It isn’t affiliated with NRG at all.

Also, I’d like to invite you to share your thoughts on our new Energy and Environment blog. We’re scouting for people who care deeply about these issues to join the discussion and share their insight.

 

http://energyandenvironmentblog.dallasnews.com/

 

Best,

Elizabeth Souder

 

Elizabeth Souder

Staff Writer

The Dallas Morning News

 

Check out our new Texas Energy & Environment blog: http://energyandenvironmentblog.dallasnews.com/


From: JW Richardson, Moderator [mailto:green.metroplex@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 7:21 PM
To: DFW Metroplex Alternative Energy Caucus; Souder, Elizabeth
Subject: $317 Million for Smart Electric Meters? I don't think so.

 

This email is about Elizabeth Souder's article in the June 30, 2009 issue of the Dallas Morning News regarding Oncor's plan to apply for a stimulus grant of $317 Million from the fed to retrofit its electric meters with so-called Smart Meters. The article touches on a multitude of related issues in the process of reporting the latest maneuver by NRG, parent of Oncor, to grab tax bucks to underwrite its ongoing program to eliminate meter readers from its workforce and increase revenue via Internet monitoring of each households' use of energy. To add insult to injury, and ignored by all interested in this action: The collection, monitoring (use of) and resale of information to third parties as to consumer use of energy crosses over into the purview of the Federal Communication Commission who's job is to safeguard consumer privacy; it not the area of oversight by the Public Utility Commission, last time I looked.

-

Oncor is the electrical power transmission arm of NRG's triad of electric services in the State of Texas. It has already started and has in place a systematic Smart Meter replacement program in North Texas aimed at elimination of all but a handful of meter readers in order to do away with the cost of doing business using human workers to monitor the consumption of the energy it sells to end consumers on the grid. I.e., wages, insurance, fleet vehicle purchases and upkeep, field supervisors, communication gear, headquarters operation and maintenance yards for all the above, etc.

-

The temporary, one time expense of replacing the meters hardly qualifies as a move to create jobs in a new industy, when one contrasts this to the permanent reduction of their employee work force and capital support infrastructure in one fell swoop, on balance... The five minutes it takes to remove a retaining ring, pull out an old meter, plug in a new Smart Meter and input the old meters' watt reading and test it's comm link with the home office, and walk to the truck to dump off the old meter and another meter for the next replacement on the work order route, never to return... hardly qualifies as the announcement of a booming new job industry source. It practically takes longer to describe this mundane task than to do it.

-

Ms Souder's article also touched on the fact that NRG is interested in getting grant money to build a grid connection from the west Texas wind farm country to cities in removed areas of Texas. I am on record about my concerns regarding the expense of doing this when no data exists as to whether the "line losses" that occur over long distances warrant this expense. In addition there are no data that justifies building a grid from west Texas in view of the time of day probability of there being sufficient power available for more than local use during normal daytime periods when the wind is usually light. Below are two paragraphs that round out the broader issue of power lines for daytime power, written some months ago. Here is the link to the full blog article written and posted on June 20th. http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/2009/06/wind-farm-power-grid-accountability.html

-

"I would like to see a standard made that adjusts for the actual (not announced, designed maximum) mean power output of mega-watt wind turbine farms. While we in the States are demanding truth in bail out and truth in banking, etc. I'd also like the truth about how much energy wind-farms actually produce between 11 am to 6 pm during summer when electrical demand is peak<ing> and at its highest need in our air conditioned, power hungry state. We are being asked to fund state bonds and national bail out funds to build a national and west to east state electric grid.. So? Just how viable will the need for distribution from far off wind farms be, when the demand for electricity is stretched to the limit during peak loads and existing wind farms in west Texas can't actually, currently, generate and supply the demands of their local towns and cities on an average day during daylight? <There is NO demand for night-time remote power; ZERO because traditional coal fired electric plants must stay on line to keep their fire bricks hot so they will not cool and crack even though there is a "no-load" situation every night for all the excess power capacity needed during air conditioned peak demand summer days.>

-

I'd also like to know why wind farms don't power water pumps to lift water from holding lakes up to higher holding lakes during the night when wind energy is excessive, and then re-use the stored water for hydro power during the day when demand for that energy is highest instead of discounted so oil companies can make mega million record profits subsidized by rate payers and state taxes? It seems to me that stored energy in the form of two and three level lakes using relatively reliable night time air flow to power the pumps for recharging them, are a relatively simple, profitable, no-brainer solution."
-

T. Boone Pickens has a state right of public domain mandate from Texas to build a power grid from the Panhandle to North Texas. His wind farms there just coincidentally will power water main pumping booster stations from the pumped out aquifer to water starved North Texas, too. Has anyone else noticed that pumping water out of that area will coincide with the disappearance of the source of that formally massive water source as the last of the glaciers in the Rocky's dry up and blow away http://www.green-metroplex.com/factoids/Glacier_Park.html forever in the next decade? Once the Ogallala Aquifer goes dry the dust bowls of the last century will be like a puff of a single cigarette smoker, in comparison to what will happen in the panhandle and states just east of the Rockys.

-

In point of fact I am known as a Wind Turbine Maven. However - Common sense is needed before just jumping in and building any other state and fed funded boon-dongles, paid from the public trough, don't you think?

-

Ironically, NRG, according to a prior DMN article, "Gets It." They are apparently building a solar generator plant to make steam to power turbines for peak demand DAYLIGHT hours only in the clear aired desert west. If memory serves, they are merely upgrading for more capacity out of their discretionary funds for future profit making venture capital reserves.

From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ and the

Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited
to come see how cost effective, and even profitable, it can be to

                                                   go green!
                                                Click here to look at an excellent model solid waste recycling program!