Monday, November 29, 2010

Global Warming - game over.

Dear (name/email withheld by request),
.
Thank you for asking after my reasons for standing down from my rants about the environment and closure of the green-metroplex.com information and how-to domain.
.
Simple, really. 1) The interest was just not there (unique hit counts leveled around 1,000 per month which is way to low for attracting paid advertisers.)
While some of the loyal followers' comments were nice to see - the fact is there is and was not a real interest in the environment here in the Metroplex.
2) Green-house gases are now past a tipping point in terms of releases that perpetuate themselves. Doesn't matter whether or not these were (at some point) mostly man caused or not. Now they are self triggering in the form of accelerated permafrost melt in the whole of the Artic Shield; accelerating Hydrate melt at the higher depths in the ocean where they were percipitated eons ago. That's due to the 3.5 degree Fareinhite rise of the last century; reduced white ice/infrared reflectivity as ice ablation progresses in the northern and southern hemispheres, etc. Our country boycotting the Green Accord is moot at this point, in my oppinion. Game over on doing something to turn global warming around. Save the money - rather, buy umbrellas and larger capacity air conditioners for our homes and businesses.
.
Hope that answers you as to why I'm now going back to my old hobby of energy futures investment for some quick cash and using the proceeds for stocking up on survival goods for our family when the economy fully tanks in the next few years. Have you noticed? Gold is now the shelter of choice that multi-million or billionaires are putting their surplus cash into. Gold futures have become hyper inflated as a result. Not capital improvements or infrastructure expansion... Hard, always useful, always valuable, Gold.
.

From Warren Richardson's Home/Office Desktop


Want to be part of our Nation's Problems or its Solutions? Take the Post 9/11 Volunteer Pledge at http://www.the912project.com/ , roll up your sleeves and learn how you can network and help.

Seniors are invited to participate at http://www.912superseniors.org 


Friday, October 29, 2010

Re: Climate Change - A Real Scientific Perspective

From Warren Richardson's Home/Office Desktop


Hello Larry and Janet,

 

Thanx for the data link. The Climategate Scandal was/is not about skewed global warming information. If you follow/followed it it's about a protest by the more conservative, cautious minded scientific community discovering that their email addresses were public property and whether or not they were on the broadcast alert info lists in which nonprofessionals were also included. Anyone who keeps their email headers visible setting on ON can then see whom else is included in a broadcast information share cycle.. No one knows which global warming pro/con faction cast the first stone that became the Climategate Scandal, which is truly a tempest in a teacup which somehow got twisted into information elitism among the so-called inner circle of the science and pseudo science community.. Twaddle. I'm replying to YOU and I don't expect the Dallas Morning News Category or Texas Legislators Category in my address book will give a rats behind that they were not included in my reply to y'all. It's a judgment call and at any rate  responsibility for ones communication TO others is ones inherent right, period.

 

I wikied several references in the data you linked. ALL point to several references and all also specifically point to the link I've inserted below, among their several, as well. Many many of the contributors/editors are climatologists and glaciologists with impeccable credentials. Unfortunately, there truly is a newbie faction of scientist that's all about money and funding, which just makes credibility a tougher game. You gotta vet your sources as a result.. If you can slog through their jargon riddled papers, and are comfortable looking up and defining terms and actually review their source references instead of agreeing on faith,  many of them likewise factor in global dimming in their global climate models. A personal, fairly wide span of attention doesn't hurt while grinding through these papers. Most comment on it and some sidebar on this or that topic and explain their findings about man made chemical reactions to light waves and reflectivity in particular. In a nutshell: Most chemical dimming has a unique reflective aspect to the light spectrum in which infrared light (heat) abides. For the most part, they are transparent from the space side and reflective from the Earth side to infrared spectrum light waves. Ahyupp they don't significantly reduce the rate of the greenhouse effect which is causing global warming. Most of the falderhall about "Dimming" is a red herring put forward by those opposed to the postulate that the Earth is heating up due to man made influences. What's scary is how small the climate change has to be near sea level to cause major changes in the amount of stored carbon dioxide in permafrost on land, or in hydrates down below 400 feet in the sea and the ice into water in glaciers which chronically hover not far from their solid/liquid/gas change of state temperatures...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming


From: LARRY JANET HARSHFIELD <ljharshfield@msn.com>
Sent: Fri, October 29, 2010 9:37:40 PM
Subject: Climate Change - A Real Scientific Perspective


 

This article quote Harold Lewis, Emeritus Professor of Physics at U C, Santa Barbara. Professor Lewis has a very long and distinguished career, just a few days ago resigned from the American Physical Society, of which he had been a member for 67 years. His resignation letter is duplicated verbatim here. Regardless of your views on Climate Change, this warrants reading and thoughtful consideration of his points.

 

 

 


Monday, October 18, 2010

Ocean inundation from glacier melt

From Warren Richardson's Home/Office Desktop


Hello, Thank you very much to those whom had input an questions about glacier loss causing ocean rise in present time in response to an earlier post of mine. Your kind words of encouragement were and are appreciated, as well.  I'll protect your anonymity by just making passing references to your responses.

 
Attached is a picture of an Inuit Village slipping into the sea, taken last summer by an eco-reporter whose name I don't have on file. The rise in sea level has caused permafrost three feet below the surface to melt and then normal wave surge from an elevated sea takes away the remaining sand. The links below are to a sampling of other distressed areas.
 
 
El NiƱo Sea-Level Rise Wreaks Havoc in California's San Francisco Bay Region
 
Sea Levels For North Carolina Rising 3 Times Faster Than In Previous 500 Years
 
When Climatologists and Glaciologists shared information and plugged it into the world community grid, a multiple voluntarily shared computer network which is a first rate substitute for super computers, their models showed that 1) there is enough heat now stored in the ocean to melt all glaciers that end up in oceans; making the process of their accelerated melting already irreversible... 2) The only variable that is beyond accurate prediction power is the one in which human green house gases effect the weather that steers ocean currents, specifically the equatorial band of warm water, to the north and south polar regions where the primary glaciers abide. How soon these glaciers melt (not IF) has a 50 to 80 year prediction, best case, worst case spread, before those glaciers are gone. Those glaciers contain over 3 inches of sea level rise but they are not the only glacier loss where water has been stored up for centuries, since the last ice age. (Glacier National Park in the Western United States is now all but glacier ice free at the end of summer; with only a thin snow pack remaining on the shaded north sides of mountain peaks. The Ogallala Aquifer in the Western Central U.S., which is recharged from Rocky Mountain Glaciers is experiencing significant draw down, with the disappearance of that area's glaciers, as well.) Link to Ogallala Aquifer Depletion website  http://www.livescience.com/environment/060324_glacier_melt.html
 
One bright correspondent disagreed about the conclusions I voiced in the previous post about human caused greenhouse gases and glacier melt. They pointed out that glaciers float and as such don't change the sea level when they melt. Actually that is only partly true. All the coastal glaciers in Iceland, and Antarctica start out grounded on the sea bed. Unlike ice burgs which have calved from these glaciers in which they displace sea water such that 90% of their mass is submerged in the ocean; bedrock supported glaciers start out with one hundred percent of their weight on bedrock and gradually feed at an incline into the ocean. Which means that they only gradually are supported by the open ocean. Worse, the underbelly melting actually acts like greasing the skids for a large ship, and by thus reducing their friction, cause them to dump into the sea at a much faster than normal rate. In Iceland, there are glaciers sliding at three times their historacal rates of travel.. Only after years of erosion under water, by 34.7 degree Fahrenheit (and rising) sea water, does a coastal glacier begin to float. As they melt, their upper body settles back down to the bedrock presenting fresh ice for melting. That is the reason for the sudden and spectacular disappearance of ice sheets hundreds of square miles in area sudden break up and disappearance almost overnight. Almost all the loss is invisible up till the last few weeks or days before they just break off and disappear into the sea as iceburgs. (Refer to: Antarctic Ice Shelf Collapse http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080210100441.htm )
 
Meanwhile continental sea coasts and low lying island nations are already experiencing massive sea rise disruptions and having to move to their poor central governmental islands where they are not wanted due to lack of funds to help them;  the governments of poor nations have no means to deal with the the influx of refugees; even as their own ocean port areas are also being encroached by the steady sea level rise. Current estimates stand at 2.8 billion human beings which are or will be displaced due to sea level rise (if it does not further accelerate) by the year 2080; with over half of that number disrupted by the year 2050. In the U.S., high dollar value real estate and businesses in the coastal and gulf states are going to produce economic collapse due to denial of this problem in present time. When they wake up to the reality, it will simply be too late to pull up stakes in an orderly fashion and relocate to higher elevations. After hurricane Katrina, Houston and Dallas thrived with the welfare cash from dislocated Louisiana citizens forced to relocate. However, we are all experiencing the pinch from that rubber money printed by a caring administration. There simply won't be enough energy, money, resources when the likes of Galveston, Houston, New Orleans, etc are forced to move all of a rush as the already expensive levee systems are breached during storms born by higher sea levels start breaching into high density residential and business centers.
 
The die off of weaker, less salt tolerant, older and very young inhabitants has already started in third world island areas due to salt incursion into fresh water aquifers in many Indian and Pacific Ocean regions. Many of the oldsters just refuse to leave when the main body migrates off their home islands and gradually die of salt poisoning or starvation because their crops and gardens fail do to sea water encroachment.. There are no hard numbers but estimates are that several hundreds per year are already on this dwindling survival spiral.
 
Again, the Inuit village not pictured with the attached photo - has already been forced to leave their centuries old summer village and set up on the mainland, much remove and away from their fishing grounds. Consider these folks our mining canary warning of things to come. The effects of global warming are at hand, not somewhere off in the distant future.

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Goodbye Green Metroplex dot com, LED's and glacier melt

From Warren Richardson's Home/Office Desktop


Hello!

 

Dateline 10/7/2010

 

The Green Metroplex website is now history, y'all. Thank you to those whom sent feedback and due diligence links to review over the years.
 
I'm currently  working on a means by which to park images, videos and other content that was being done on that domain from time to time; actually in more frequency than green theme content of the past few months. The websites hit counters were showing high traffic for saved Minard and Richardson family related images, videos and Gram Minards recordings and recollections of our family heritage and almost zero web page views, as it happens.
 
The website was an expensive experiment/hobby and common sense finally intervened. Frankly, there are many and better green theme websites out there for anyone with a genuine interest in saving money by going green and reducing their carbon footprint in the bargain. In our home we are replacing 5 plus year old Compact Fluorescent bulbs, now, with LED lighting (from the savings that the CFL's gave us) We should be ready for the scheduled demise and massive jump in price caused by demand in 2012, when the incandescent bulb can no longer be legally sold in the states. I am glad to be phasing into the LED lighting because frankly, safely disposing of the worn out CFL lights is doable but it's a pain...
 
Some carbon footprint reductions are too late to head off some world disasters, as we speak. Glaciologists whom have factored in the rise in mean temperature of the world's ocean's from 32 degrees Fahrenheit to its current 34.7 degrees Fahrenheit mean average say that there is sufficient heat energy now to melt all the glaciers that directly empty into the oceans, by 2080 which should continue to raise sea levels by a bit over 3 feet. Carbon emission control can only slow the interference with the ocean's currents - only the glaciers have the difference in temperature sufficient to absorb these hotter seas, however. In the mean time, large city's inland that get water from underground aquifers recharged from mountain glacier melt will soon be in major stress very soon as these formerly reliable sources of fresh water have all but disappeared, too.
 
Over a billion human beings on every continent are being or will be dislocated by the ocean sea level rise by the end of this century. The coral island nations are already suffering from sea water high tide flooding in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. New Orleans, which is sinking very fast as the oil is pumped out from under it and the state of Florida who's growing retirement cities pump the lens of fresh water from rain out so fast it is being reduce as well, have less than 50 years (some say 40 years) before their barrier reefs and protective swamps will be gone and their population centers take sea water storm hits from the gulf and Atlantic directly.
 
Anyone out there still staunch supporters of the "factoid" that mankind is not a factor in climate and environmental change? No? Don't want to hear it? not listening - New! Then please, DON'T buy beachfront property in Al Gore's neighborhood, y'all. Get it cheap on Miami Beach, Galveston Island or Houston ;-)
 

Fw: The appointment of a fool to be king comes to mind from Nostrodomas' Predictions

 

From Warren Richardson's Home/Office Desktop


Hello!

 

Dateline 10/7/2010
 
Whilst cleaning out the late green.metroplex@yahoo.com messages and diatribes, the below article from a Czech Republic news source came to view and I contemplated deletion but considering the current fence riding voter turnout coming in a month - thought, "Naw - the attached article truly bears repeating." wr

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: "JW Richardson, Moderator" <green.metroplex@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thu, October 7, 2010
Subject: The appointment of a fool to be king comes to mind from Nostradamus' Predictions

 

       This quote was translated into English  from an article appearing in the  Czech Republic as published in the Prager Zeitung of 28 April  2010.
  
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a  citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.  It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude  of fools such as those who made him their president."
 


  





Sunday, July 11, 2010

Some No-Bull proactice good news about recycling from Purina

Purina's Friskies Cat Food is promoting a pro-recycle
campaign called, "Together We Can," with its aluminum
cans. According to them if one recycles one 5.5 oz.
aluminum can it saves enough energy to power one
60 watt light bulb for three hours. The recycled aluminum
saves 95% of the energy used to make aluminum cans
from virgin materials. The below image is a scanned
promo insert found attached to a can of Friskies Cat Food.
Friskies is a Trademark of Purina; also a registered trade name.

The web address of this page is http://www.green-metroplex.com/Assorted/Proactive/Pictures.htm
Posted as a public service:
  From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
  for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
  Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ Web Blog and the

  Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited 
  to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big

Thursday, July 8, 2010

The Taste That Kills

Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" published in the 1950's brought home the objectively verified fact that our planet's ecology was in trouble due to the use of pesticides; with emphasis on DDT. A new book out this year named "Exitotoxins : The Taste That Killsby Russell L. Blaylock is now on the stands that should rightly be ranked with Ms. Carson's earth shaking works. Written by an experienced practicing neurosurgeon - this book will blow your socks off on the real why's for neurological diseases and deficiency's such as Alzheimer's and learning disabilities linked directly to the food industry chemical food additives consumed at all ages. Check it out for yourself.
 
  From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
  for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
  Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ Web Blog and the
  Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited 
  to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

A simple dietary solution to beat heart and diabetes and cancer diseases

 From the Desktop of 

J. Warren Richardson

 

 

I've recurrent cancer and suffer from type 2 diabetes, as well - However, the numbers counts for the antigenic markers in my blood have steadily decreased since I started eating more plant food and only meat, fish or poultry on rare occasions. Below the source links are a short, telling couple-three sentences from 
http://evolvingwellness.com/posts/398/salba-whole-seed/ which is about organic, natural (not genetically modified) Salba seed (not Chia seed, its close relative) one uses in two uncooked tablespoon doses sprinkled on or into salads, yogurt, juice drinks...

The source link just below is where the last three sentences for this email came from:

http://evolvingwellness.com/posts/1194/starve-cancer-prevent-disease-and-nurture-great-health-with-this-simple-approach/ which just may inspire you to help yourself or a loved one or friend with life threatening illness, too.

 It seems that we can't turn the corner today, without hearing that healthy eating is important for us. But so many of us still either do not grasp what this fully means, or < are too apathetic or > take it seriously enough to actually apply it to our life.

If you take the last ten stories you heard about food breakthrough benefits on the news, what foods where they about? What common theme do the foods have? Can you spot it?

You got it! All the foods that have the most protective, preventative, healing and health benefits all come from natural plant food.

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Two items have come across my desk this week that I consider worthy of broad dissemination
 
Dateline February 23, 2010: According to the Star-Telegram of Fort Worth, TXU Energy wants 
to reach electricity consumers whom get their power through Oncor through a new program to 
be formally announced today by the Irving-based retail electric provider. TXU is teaming up with 
a California-based company, SolarCity, 
to lease solar panels that will be installed for free.
 
An old friend sent the below link to the Cap and Dividend movement. It would severely restrict Cap and Trade which as you may already know is unworkable and only delays making major polluters clean up their acts. There is a lot of pork in the later as well.
  From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
  for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
  Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ Web Blog and the
  Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited 
  to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big

Friday, January 8, 2010

Environmental Cap and Trade Shell Game

 From the Desktop of 
J. Warren Richardson

 

 I've never met ex gov and spec operator Jesse Ventura. Now he has an expose reality TV show. Here are 6 video feeds he has aired about a global warming conspiracy where in the issue of global warming is not the focus but rather the exploitation of the issue of global warming is the whole point. Since I have repeatedly mentioned over the past five years that cap and trade is not a solution for global warming - I found this rather self-serving melodramatic series of videos worthy of review. So here's a YouTube style presentation of the six above mentioned video feeds. You'll have to put up with a lot of hyperbole on the part of the "star" of the series but there is content being aired worth being patient. http://dprogram.net/2009/12/20/video-conspiracy-theory-with-jesse-ventura-global-warming-episode-3/ Depending on your email service either click on the URL above or highlight and copy it and paste it into an open web page address bar. wr


Sunday, December 13, 2009

LED lighting: Rant update.

Since indicating and promoting our invivo unsuccessful attempts to obtain LED lighting to retrofit our aging compact fluorescent lamps a lot has changed in three months.
Time constraints just now make it important to keep this brief. Bottom line, WalMart now stocks a limited number of indoor, outdoor and Par LED lamps. Yep, they are pricey but not as expensive as those on-line. The compromise in price is at the cost of life span. A 1,000 lumen WalMart stocked brand has 40,000 hours of life as opposed to a 1,000 lumen one on-line for 15 bucks more having 60,000 hours of life.
 
  From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
  for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
  Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ Web Blog and the
  Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited 
  to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big

Friday, October 30, 2009

Update - LED lighting

The up front cost of LED replacement equivalent lamps can be somewhat daunting to the uninitiated.  
  One must and probably will do the math before their first replacement of conventional incandescent lamps and compact fluorescent models with LED lighting. Before dismissal out of hand one should be aware of three key technical factoids which MUST be factored into the buying formula (these are not the ONLY factors, but still these three items MUST be remembered and referenced to when buying replacement LED bulbs).
  1. Lumens not watts are the primary quality of lamp lighting. Lumens are the measured amount of light a lamp emits (in the visible-to-the-eye spectrum of light). One does not replace a 100 watt incandescent light with an equivalent LED light so much as one replaces a 100 watt, 920 Lumen incandescent lamp taking 10 hours to burn 1 kilowatt hour of energy with a 6.4 watt, 900 Lumen LED lamp taking 156 hours to burn 1 kilowatt hour of energy to see by, and so forth. The "color temperature" of the Lumens is also important with "Cool White" and "Warm White" the most common buzz terms to consider depending on where and for what need they are to be used...
  2. Watts are burned to make the light one needs for an application for both indoor and outdoor lighting. The reduced LED wattage has a double importance for indoor lighting in that during summer operation one's cooling system does not have to remove near as much waste heat (average .075th of the heat) from LED lights as compared to equivalent incandescent lighting. (Remember from your high school science, that Watts are a measure of heat energy, originally for steam engines and later for electrical generators.). Practically speaking, all lighting energy converts back into heat energy.
  Both indoor and outdoor LED lighting applications reduce the amount of non-renewable, greenhouse emissions of one's electrical utility as well; and that will take pressure off of installation of ever more transmission lines to carry ever greater demand for that irreplaceable-never-going-away-electrical-product. In many applications it is actually cost effective to install solar panels on security night light standard poles populated by low battery power consumpting LED's that would otherwise have to have transmission lines run to them in new public locations. Large back yards could benefit from solar powered LED motion activated security lighting; breaking even when one does not have to run building code safe wiring to a new security light system. The criminal sport of stripping copper wiring from municipal light standard poles would be circumvented, as well.
  3. LED lighting averages 50,000 hours MLBF "Mean Life Before Failure" which is significantly less than the 8,000 MLBF to replace compact fluorescent lamps (requiring special handling to dispose of these mercury rich appliances) and 1,200 MLBF for the average incandescent lamp. Most municipalities and large business operations have full time paid staff that do nothing but replace lighting during their 8-5 week long shifts with overtime if they get behind. Factor these considerations in when contemplating the "high cost" of replacement of home or business or municipal lighting with ultra-long-life LED lighting, as well.
  It has been four plus years and a substantial reduction in our utility bill later since retrofitting to compact fluorescent lighting. We think it is time to step up and replace CFL's and incandescent lighting as they burn out with LED's for even more savings. The average return on investment is less than three years with the next 12 to 15 years MLBF that follow being all gravey. jwr
.
Other LED Links
End.

HANDY SWITCH RECALL PRODUCT RECALL NOTICE

For those of y'all that use the wireless Handy Switch or know of
someone who may have one or more of them; this is a recall
you can take advantage of because it is a manufacturer based
recall... I bought my first Handy Switch through Idea Village
a number of years ago and have a night lamp plugged into it
that we use when getting up during the wee hours which can
be turned on while we pad around in our otherwise dark house,
then turned back off once we stumble into bed-die bye,
afterwords. Later I found it on sale at Fry's Electronics and got
one for our kitchen cabinet under shelf add-on fluorescent
lighting instead of fumbling for thumb switches, toggle wheels 
and buttons to push; all left in the ON position and powered
through one wireless switch located at the most used work
station of our kitchen counter. All the extension wiring is neatly
tie-wrapped.
.
When I called the recall toll free number and talked to a nice
Asian accented lady. I found that my admission that I only
bought ONE Handy Switch from Idea Village she smoothly
said that they would send TWO prepaid mailers for BOTH
Handy Switches... This was a Manufacturer's recall. Read the
recall email message below to get the link or toll free number
for your own cycle of action. Don't ignore it, please. jwr
.
P.S., As a retired tradesman I can explain that the switch, while
low to nil power consuming while in the Off mode, DOES have
a potential to overheat due to a phenomenon known as and
related to how it works while idle. "Hysteresis Loss" is the
phenomenon; when in an idle mode. That is the phenomenon
that power coils and transformers have in which a trickle of
electricity leaks through a circuit and is designed into them
such that the leakage creates a counter-effect which impedes
or chokes off any more energy from leaking through the coil
or transformer. Very fine wire devices may break or short out
over the age of a device - when that happens they allow more
energy to "Leak Through" it. Eventually they burn out more and
more fine wires and eventually burn out in a burst of short
circuited energy when too much heat builds up in themselves
to choke off the power. Modern devices use electronic circuits
to choke the idle-but-not-off use of energy, now. They don't
waste Hysteresis Energy at all. End. See In-line attached below.

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Handy Switch Customer Service <handyswitch.cs@fulfillment.com>
To: JOSEPH W RICHARDSON <GREEN.METROPLEX@YAHOO.COM>
Sent: Wed, October 21, 2009 4:33:26 PM
Subject: HANDY SWITCH RECALL PRODUCT RECALL NOTICE

RE:    IMPORTANT RECALL NOTICE

October 21, 2009

Dear Valued Customer,

Our records indicate that you purchased a Handy Switch Wireless Remote Light Switch from IdeaVillage. We strive to ensure that each product we deliver is the best quality and provides the best possible customer experience.

It has come to our attention that the receiver (the component that fits into the wall outlet with a built-in night light) can overheat, posing a fire hazard to consumers. The company has received 14 reports of overheating, including 9 reports of fire, 5 of which resulted in property damage. No injuries have been reported.. You should unplug and stop using your receiver and register for a free remedy.

In cooperation with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, IdeaVillage is voluntarily providing consumers with the choice of one of two free remedies: (1) a snap-on protective cap cover to place over the receiver to securely contain any possible fire due to overheating or (2) a wireless remote light switch replacement product.

If you prefer a snap-on protective cap cover, we will send you a protective cap to simply place over the receiver, along with easy installation instructions. Note this cover will not prevent overheating from occurring, but rather will contain any resulting fire. If you prefer a wireless remote light switch replacement product, we will send you a postage pre-paid mailer in which to place your Handy Switch receiver (the component that plugs into the wall) to send it back to us. Upon receipt of your receiver, we will send a replacement product, the Super Switch, free of charge.

For more information on the recall program and registration for your free remedy, please visit our website at: www.handyswitchrecall.com or call IdeaVillage toll-free at: (888) 655-4339 between 5:00 am and 6:00 pm (Pacific) Monday through Friday. You can also contact customer service by email at handyswitch.cs@fulfillment.com.

We appreciate your patience.

Sincerely,

David Epstein
Vice President

Zero E House in Lewisville Texas

Dateline Friday, 30 October 2009
 
Hey there Guy,

 

Here's a first hat-pass as we search for a less censorious domain

and email provider than Yahoo! for the green-metroplex caucus
to be parked on.

.

The Dallas Morning News Metro section covered by writer

Wendy Hundley whundley@dallasnews.com of this eco-friendly

home, soon to be lived in by Amanda Ferguson's and her
Husband Scott
Owens after tearing down the old family frame

house that she grew up in. The project has become a poster

child for Green Craft Builders, LLC et all, who specialize in the
construction
of Zero-E homes and offices in the DFW Metroplex.  

.
If you link to nothing else on their domain website, go to the
video links and turn up the volume on your speakers when you
peruse their assorted construction of assorted eco-friendly items.
That page alone is worth the half hour or so it'll take to view
the videos of the construction and knowledge base available
concerning the Timber Creek Energy Zero House built right here
in the DFW Metroplex: http://timbercreekzeroenergyhouse.com/videos.html
Keep a notepad handy for the first rate links to sustainable construction
products and other useful earth friendly goods. I personally book
marked them and also highlighted, copied and pasted their URL's
into an info manager,
just to be sure the links were not typo'd.
There is a tour of the house during the next four Fri - Sat's.
.
Here is the home page link, also: http://timbercreekzeroenergyhouse.com/
  From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
  for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
  Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ Web Blog and the
  Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited 
  to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big

Sunday, September 27, 2009

We ain't running out of no stinking oil!

   Ahem: In the news are exasperated pro-oil types that rant about there being no lack of oil available; stating that the available "reserves" and still undiscovered oil available which are sufficient to satisfy the greediest good oil boys n girls for centuries.
   In truth, it is a more or less correct factoid that we are NOT running out of oil at this time. What's being overlooked is that the barrels per year increase of oil pumped out of the ground is in still in decline since a decade ago; however stocks of oil are approaching glut proportions but that is laid squarely at the feet of we who are cutting  back on our consumption of its distilled products such as diesel fuel and gasoline. 
   A goodly number of Americans have rerouted their consumption to thriftier auto's and reduced discretionary spending on fuel and by staying home a lot more (thus making home entertainment a banner year last year) or moving closer to their workplace to reduce their commute and impacting the urbane sprawl and new home building market to some degree. Indeed the local paper has touted the resurgence of formerly blighted inner city areas by the jump in loft apartments and converted warehouse into condominiums populated by Gen Y'ers and Millenials, making it possible for thousands of former commuters to peddle to work or ride the street car or bus to there.
   What's being overlooked is that it is no longer possible for one to kick over a clod and bring in a gusher of the black gold that used make $235 bucks per wildcat dollar in profit as it travels through various streams into "higher" grade byproducts. The recent discovery of an astounding sized "oil reserve" in the Gulf of Mexico is a classic example of the the availability of oil "still out there waiting to be found." Umm, has anyone figured out how much it's going to cost to build a floating platform able to safely maintain its position over the oil reserves in deepwater, open seaways in the face of hurricanes; drill to 35,000 feet to tap into the top of the dome of this shale oil; to extract it via fracturing and pump it to the surface and load it onto ships bound for refinery's?
   And secondarily, this oil which will be in production in about ten years, is still only a fraction of the 3% total US Market oil produced in and used by Americans. The reason that we import 97% of our oil is that the imported oil is still cheaper and easier to get to the surface and into tankers bound for US refineries folks, precisely because oil has to be ever higher in price for it to be profitable to drill and pump it. That price, based on world wide demand is currently somewhere in the $65 buck a barrel range it would seem. (A decade ago crude was around $35.00 USD per barrel. Remember, it was the spiraling price of crude that triggered the U.S. economic melt down powered by $145.00 per barrel prices that we are still recovering from and it is only Americans <with the rest of the world following our lead> with the sense to cut back on our discretionary consumption of energy which has dropped the price of fuel and stabilized the economy, so far; That is in spite of the economic bail out headlines taking the credit. Shoot, even my insurance broker has a Smart Car for his commute to his offices, now.).
   Meanwhile China and India and a number of other sleeping giant middle class auto buyers world wide continue to grow at rates that outstrip US ability to compete for market share, while our dollars get less and less valuable due to the enormous debt being deeded over to those several other countries. And never forget, oil IS the gold standard of the world because it is the tremendous markup from crude to products that drives it as a major commodity that is getting more and more costly to extract from mother Earth and on its way to market.
   Meanwhile, once again, the good oil boys have tried to flourish the red cape in front of our consuming eyes to distract us from the fact that we need to be firm in our resolve to make carbon fuels of all types only a dwindling part of a triad of energy. We really need to convert to none-carbon, renewable fuels as fast as we can manage it; with electric battery power as fuel as a major change away from Detroit pig-iron cars and trucks belching fumes rich with greenhouse gases.
   Whew
  From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
  for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
  Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ Web Blog and the
  Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited 
  to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big

Friday, September 25, 2009

The next step down in lighting power consumption

At the risk of appearing to brag, our electrical consumption stats (measured in Kilowatt Hours) are down by over 35% since four plus years ago when we first decided to "Go Green;" that is because we have implemented most of those things posted on the www.green-metroplex.com website and our blogs. Our deciduous shade is keeping the sun off in the summer; almost all of our appliances are Energy Star rated; we unplug most electrical vampires when not in use; and all but a couple lights are fluorescent or compact fluorescent, as well. We're our own guinea pig when it comes to making these suggestions for how to save money by becoming greener over time (out of cash flow). Now, many of our compact fluorescent lighting bulbs are starting to approach their life span and we admit to lusting after LED lighting to replace them as the CFL's wear out. Our CFL's have paid us back in spades in their kilowatt power saving so we are looking to reduce our power needs even more by using the new LED lighting technology during our next replacement go-round and reduce our carbon footprint even more by not having to recycle mercury rich CFL's any longer, either
However...
While trying to shop them at our local Lowe's Home Improvement - I found that they stock not one LED lamp, period. At Wal-Mart there are stick on under-shelf LED's and we actually have a small number of those at home in the odd dark nook, because they are so handy to use. The spouse is not happy with the intense color of LED stick on lights and flashlights we own, but I've witnessed how demonstration full sized LED lighting replacements have tinted lenses to compensate for this nuisance factor.
At any rate, what I'm looking for is a tenfold drop in lighting power for the same lumen's count as our former incandescents used to emit and our compact florescent lamps which have fairly well matched their outputs for the past half decade. Remember, it's lumen's not watts that are the target prime benchmark, i.e., just sufficient brightness that one does not have to peer intently to easily see and not too bright such that one needs sunglasses to not squint whilst in their presence.
So far I've been stumped at finding retrofit LED Lamps in retail venues the local area - however, here's a link to my first cast into the Internet: http://www.earthled.com/ ... I'll keep you posted. wr
 
From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ and the
Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited
to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Model Electrical Triad: Updated

        A suggested...
model standard
(For an Electrical Generation Triad)


 

Adoption of this model electrical regulation concept by ERCOT and utility regulators in other states would accelerate a trend toward renewable energy solutions and a reduction of pollution and greenhouse gas emissions that are fostered by the burning of none renewable fuels for electrical production. This triad would not do away with conventional power generators, nor nuclear power plants, because to do so is not practical nor will it win support from major stockholders of utility companies, many of whom contribute significant cash for re-elections of those representatives that ERCOT and other utility regulators in other states are answerable to.

Utility companies faced with mandates from their regulators will find it in their stockholders best interests to jump on the band-wagon and start installation of PV and none wind turbulence damaged wind turbines on the buildings in cities and suburbs to which they supply electrical energy; instead of buying ever larger blocks of carbon credits, with this suggested scheme. They would make de-facto partners of their electrical consuming customers by the utilization of inside city limits subscribers' structures, by implementation of lease-back, low fixed kilowatt hourly rates as a means to pay down the installation price of these systems on their customers' buildings and otherwise unused inner-city land. It is a win-win scenario.

The utilities' existing grid-connected conventional electrical power plants would be retained and used as load-leveling sites for the existing grid, which should require no new high tension power lines to be installed as load demands continue to increase every year; because the commercial sized solar (focused solar for steam and PV systems) and wind turbines that they themselves would, for the most part, be installed at the load end of their grid since these generators do not pollute nor make greenhouse gases when making electrical energy.


Above is an example of a wind turbine that is not damaged by wind turbulence.
There are twisted, multi-vane horizontal-axle variants as well. These turbines are low
speed, quiet and none-lethal-to-nature. When mounted with inexpensive, self-powered
so-called  "anti-gravity" thrust bearings (essentially comprised of like-charged direct-
current magnetic fields that repel each the other, effectively making them frictionless
bearings) this type of turbine does not induce the structural damage or noise caused
by the induced vibration of conventional bearings, to the tops of buildings that they are
mounted upon.

Source: http://www.green-metroplex.com/Assorted/Ideas/Electrical_Triad.html posted on Tuesday, 9/22/2009
 


The conundrum of utility regulators toward environmentally progressive reform

Dear Texas State and Federal Legislator, et al,

 

I have an idea for ERCOT that addresses the conundrum of emotionally conservative vested interests that block progress toward an more environmentally friendly utility regulation body. Please consider it and pass it on to them if you concur:

 

    

        A suggested...
model standard
(For an Electrical Generation Triad)


 

Adoption of this model electrical regulation concept by ERCOT and utility regulators in other states would accelerate a trend toward renewable energy solutions and a reduction of pollution and greenhouse gas emissions that are fostered by the burning of none renewable fuels for electrical production. This triad would not do away with conventional power generators, nor nuclear power plants, because to do so is not practical nor will it win support from major stockholders of utility companies, many of whom contribute significant cash for re-elections of those representatives that ERCOT and other utility regulators in other states are answerable to.

Utility companies faced with mandates from their regulators will find it in their stockholders best interests to jump on the band-wagon and start installation of PV and none wind turbulence damaged wind turbines on the buildings in cities and suburbs to which they supply electrical energy; instead of buying ever larger blocks of carbon credits, with this suggested scheme. They would make de-facto partners of their electrical consuming customers by the utilization of inside city limits subscribers' structures, by implementation of lease-back, low fixed kilowatt hourly rates as a means to pay down the installation price of these systems on their customers' buildings and otherwise unused inner-city land. It is a win-win scenario.

The utilities' existing grid-connected conventional electrical power plants would be retained and used as load-leveling sites for the existing grid, which should require no new high tension power lines to be installed as load demands continue to increase every year; because the commercial sized solar (focused solar for steam and PV systems) and wind turbines that they themselves would, for the most part, be installed at the load end of their grid since these generators do not pollute nor make greenhouse gases when making electrical energy.


Above is an example of a wind turbine that is not damaged by wind turbulence.
There are twisted, multi-vane horizontal-axle variants as well. These turbines are low
speed, quite and none-lethal-to-nature. When mounted with inexpensive, self-powered
so-called  "
anti-gravity" thrust bearings
this type of turbine does not induce structural
damage caused by induced vibration, to the tops of buildings that they are mounted upon. 

 
 
From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ and the
Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited
to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big

Sunday, September 13, 2009

Hydrates - an unraveling disaster in the wings

This Reply came from a "Hardball_Player" list member who also reads the Information Not Spam Blog: "Dear Mr. Warren, OK I understood most of your news article a.k.a., your opinion, about the Northwest Passage shipping which is opening up next summer due to global warming. But you lost me with your inserted comments about hydrates. What the heck does that have to do with the cost of lumber from Russia? What are hydrates and why should I care?"
My reply: Dear Reader, Excellent questions. (be advised if you want to see my reference materials, (some) of their links are at the bottom of this rant.) As you may have surmised, I am in the camp that foresees global warming as fact, not fiction, which is somewhat exacerbated by human activity in the form of none renewable fuel burning, also as a reality. In my opinion, based on years of study of the problem, there are three major air pollution sources and greenhouse gases. Sulfur Dioxide, Methane and Carbon Dioxide; all three are being pumped into the air every day from automobiles, electric plants, homes, businesses and cattle yards and every walk of life where burning of some form of fuel is converted to useful human uses most notably we make carbon dioxide and methane by the metric tons per hour into the air and into rivers and oceans, directly trapping quite a lot of the sun's solar energy in the air by these major greenhouse gases; directly warming our world's oceans (5 degrees on average over the past century of time), via absorption of the air's heat; which circulates from mid-earth latitudes into the polar regions causing ice sheet melt off.
Unfortunately, or fortunately depending on ones point of view, nature has natural sources (and counter balance forces) for these gases as well. However, human contributions are unbalancing those natural cycles. Our insertion of an un-natural addition of these greenhouse gases is on the verge of causing a major change in the rate of capture of nature's stored up methane and carbon dioxide and there are those in the scientific community who say that we very possibly may have passed the point of no return. What they are alluding to is the carbon dioxide stored in the form of a mix of carbon dioxide and methane hydrates on the ocean floor.
To understand these carbon chemical compounds requires a bit of understanding of how carbon dioxide and methane reacts to pressure and temperature. Carbon Dioxide and Methane is found free floating in the air and also dissolved in water, much like one finds oxygen and nitrogen there as well. You already know that oxygen dissolved in water is what makes it possible for fish to breath underwater. Their gills filter the water flowing through them and extract the oxygen their muscles and digestive tracts need, to make the energy needed for survival. Like animals on the surface, the product of breathing by fishes creates a carbon dioxide bye product; having eaten plant or other food matter, their feces as well as the natural death of plants makes methane gas directly or through decomposition; as their feces decays it causes methane formation, as well. Air breathing and fuel burning, likewise cause carbon dioxide on the surface but what affects global climate the most severely is the 25 fold pollution effects of methane more than carbon dioxide; decomposition of plant and fecal mater also makes the vast majority of methane in nature. The build up of temperature causes fresh and salt water to absorb the methane and carbon dioxide, as well. The gist of what I'm explaining is so that you'll understand that there is a lot of greenhouse affect carbon in the form of these two chemicals dissolved and in solution in water and in the vast water columns called oceans of earth in particular. In a nutshell, the warmer the water, the less greenhouse gas will stay in the water.
In chemistry, simply put, there are three major physical conditions for elements and compounds and they are: Gas, Liquid and Solid. (Yes SW, plasma is the 4th but not needed in this dissertation on condensed star stuff called carbons in the form of methane and carbon dioxide.). Gas, liquids and solids depend on both temperature and pressure to determine which state one will find them in. At sea level pressures and temperatures one finds them as a gas. In water columns with pressures less than 450 feet one finds them dissolved and in liquid states. However, as the temperature approaches 33 degrees and pressures build at depths past 480 feet we see that there are forces in play that make methane in particular and carbon dioxide to some degree; convert to solid states. Below 600 feet Methane at any temperature below 40 degrees is a solid as one continues down the continental slopes of the deep ocean and ever greater pressures. The condensed methane crystals have the appearance and form of the dirty water-ice one may be more familiar with; but would explode directly into gas if suddenly brought to above sea level pressures at the surface, much like dry ice does if not insulated. Carbon Dioxide is excreted in adapted ways by sea life but is much slower to convert to solids at deep ocean depths. In fact all of your high school chemistry courses and experiments are out the door when one is operating at low temperatures and high deep-sea pressures. For example it is the very high pressure of the ocean at thousands of feet down that makes it possible for sea water to NOT freeze at temperatures well below 32 degrees Fahrenheit in the pitch  black of abyssal deeps.
Here is the Point: As human introduction of un-natural quantities of methane via such activities as the cattle industry and carbon dioxide via electric production and via carbon dioxide emissions by automobiles continuously contribute to a spike in global air temperatures, which have warmed the the surface of the oceans of the world for the past 100 years, far more than it would naturally occur in nature - we are starting to warm hydrates which have been stable for many Millenia prior to this hundred year span of time.
By way of illustration: If one were to focus on one hydrate crystal structure, say the size of a full duffel bag, at 480 feet down on the ocean floor, say 50 years ago - the one degree rise in temperature at that time would have caused it to emit (for illustration purposes) one bubble of methane gas every month or two. At 500 feet, say, one bubble per year; and no bubbles at all below say, 600 feet. Today most of the hydrates will have disappeared through evaporation at 450 feet, due to the steady rise in ocean temperature. Hydrates at 500 feet are bubbling daily and at 600 feet you'd find bubbles forming and taking off toward the surface at irregular intervals and at 700 feet they could be found forming slowly on the outside surface of hydrates, if one looked closely.
To get a sense of scale, if you were to lay a postage stamp on the ground then try to imagine that you could encompass the area the size of the United States in comparison; that is the jump in scale that occurred in methane gas release by humans from 100 years ago through now, in present time. One tends to forget just how immense the size of our ocean floors are and the tremendous greenhouse gas reserves stored under a very sensitive temperature/pressure ratio experiment in physics, in its vast and deep waters. Their combined area makes the United States look like the postage stamp in this comparison, by comparison.
Our only recourse is a crash course change in life-style in which we change very fast to a none carbon burning/consuming populace wherein whatever form of renewable none carbon based energy we use is both renewable and storable for periods when it's not easily available (i.E., focused array solar-heated, pressurized sodium storage for electric generation both during the day and at night.)... It's a given that we'll have to use current industry to make solar collectors and turbulence tolerant inner city wind turbines of every hue and sort; unearthing our waste dumps, composting everything and planting vast forests on that to lock up the carbon dioxide into trees to increase oxygen ratios and reduce CO2; during the interim we'll continue burning diesel fuel to power drills to tap into Geo-thermal and other renewable resources, etc., add infinausia. The question is will we, our elected representatives who reflect our collective will and the other Doubting Thomas types get on board a fast, furious phase over before the tipping point is beyond our ability to come back from the precipice? Or, more brutally, before we become extinct as a species because we cannot adapt to the reality the earth is foisting onto us in payment for our ignorance as to what we are doing to it because we didn't understand the World Wide Physics involved while keeping Pandora's Box open, like it or not?
 
References:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Information-NotSpam/message/391 <-- Source of term "Hyddrates" that started this thread. end
 
From the desktop of Warren Richardson winking  pro-active advocate
for conversion to energy alternatives and carbon footprint reduction.
Moderator of 
http://dfw-alt-e-caucus.blogspot.com/ and the
Webmaster of http://www.green-metroplex.com/ ... You are invited
to come see how cost effective, and sometimes profitable it can be 
to
                                         go green! save big!
                           Click here to look at an excellent model solid waste recycling program!